• Literally Anything: Movies
  • Film Index
  • The Criterion Collection
  • Collections
  • Academy Award Nominees
  • Notes and Links
  • About
  LITERALLY ANYTHING: MOVIES

Updates

The Smashing Machine (2025)

2/27/2026

Comments

 
Picture
R and a lot of this has to do with Safdie.  While there is language, a lot of it is tempered compared to something like Uncut Gems.  However, the bulk of the movie has to do with violence, drug addiction, domestic abuse --both physical and mental --and a scene depicting a pretty intense suicide attempt.  There is on screen blood, which is something that you have to get used to because one of the motifs is a commentary on the viciousness of the sport.  A well-deserved R.

DIRECTOR:  Benny Safdie

Yeah, I do think it is weird that Dwayne Johnson wasn't nominated for anything.  I'm just coming out and saying it.  He's incredible in this.  I'm even going as far as to say that I don't even know what I like anymore because I shouldn't like any of this.  I don't like sports.  I don't like biopics.  I don't like Benny Safdie.  You would think that I would be really annoyed under any other circumstance.  And while it isn't even close to my favorite movie of the year, I can't deny that there's an incredible amount of quality in this film.

The main draw is Dwayne Johnson.  I don't want to take anything away from Emily Blunt because her performance is (pun not intended) rock solid.  But if Mark Kerr (whom I mentally will be giggling that his name is "marker") is the cement of this film, my goodness, does Dwayne Johnson nail an incredible performance.  This is one of those performances that had me try to reach out to Johnson and congratulate him on one of those tour de force portrayals.  You know that Johnson had to think that this was going to be the movie that got him the Oscar, right?  To not even be nominated is kind of insane.  Between Hugh Jackman for Song Sung Blue and Dwayne Johnson for The Smashing Machine, it's kind of making me question the entire category.  Yeah, I'm griping a little bit because I really don't think that Ethan Hawke's nomination for Blue Moon is better than either performance I saw.  (Again, I really feel like I'm picking on Ethan Hawke, which is something that I don't want to do.)  

Johnson as Mark Kerr is both incredibly endearing and damning at the same time.  Let's put aside that, physically, he might be one of the only people on the planet who can embody someone like Mark Kerr.  He's this goliath of a man who is almost a child internally. (Note:  I also find it bizarre that the real Mark Kerr is in this movie because Kerr doesn't come across as sympathetic a lot of the time.) Johnson seems to understand that, while Kerr's devotion to the sport is his primary drive, he lacks even basic understandings of interpersonal relationships.  He thinks that he's the hero of his own story and that he is the victim of circumstance.  He isn't traditionally a "bad guy".  There are things that should absolutely be condemned for, but he doesn't do anything out of villainy.  If anything, his big push is that he is emotionally immature.  He feeds this toxic and self-sabotaging relationship with Dawn.  But he also is the quintessential "good guy" toxic personality.  He says awful things with a nice guy voice and is shocked when people are hurt by what he does.  I'm not saying that Dawn is off the hook.  Quite the opposite.  Kerr was clearly attracted to someone that he can pin as the root of his problems.  Every time that Mark does something toxic, Dawn will do something more toxic.  It makes him the good guy in every scenario because Dawn demonizes herself.  And Johnson gets that.

There are a couple of crazy things about the fact that Dwayne Johnson took this role, one of which makes me questioning everything that I thought that I knew about Johnson.  I read somewhere (the Internet!  It has to be true!) that Dwayne Johnson doesn't take roles where he loses a fight.  Yet, a lot of this movie is almost a commentary on being obsessed with winning and how stupid that really is.  One of the key character beats is in the first act of this movie.  Mark is being interviewed by a Japanese journalist about what it might mean to lose a fight.  Mark, after we witness him just completely destroy a bunch of fighters in rapid succession, stresses that he can't even intellectualize the question.  Losing --and I do believe that Mark believes this --is so inconceivable.  For the sake of storytelling, coupled with the notion that losing is something that everyone experiences, Mark loses his next match.  Sure, it was because the other guy broke the rules and the match as declared as "no contest."  (I'm pretty sure that means the whole thing was null and void, but what do I know?  I hate sports.) It doesn't matter for Mark.  Mark falls into a deep, self-destructive funk and his life falls apart.  But the insane part is...that's totally Dwayne Johnson.  Heck, there's a part of me that thinks that Dwayne Johnson is really angry for not getting nominated for Best Actor for the Oscars.  Yet, he can tell this story about a guy who crashes out over losing.

One of my complaints about biopics is that they tend to be about the same things over and over, especially when any degree of celebrity is involved.  Usually, people turn to drugs and there's this narrative of how they overcame those drugs to become the best in the world.  That's not this story.  I mean, it is.  Johnson said in an interview that The Smashing Machine was not a fight movie.  I agree.  It's a character movie that is tied to the notion of different kinds of toxic addictions.  Even though Mark starts his career on top, there's never a moment when he's not on drugs.  Sure, he doesn't necessarily come across as a traditional addict in cinema.  He's still charming to most people.  He's got this tiny little voice when asking for prescription narcotics.  But the fact that we never actually met Mark at the beginning when he wasn't addiction to some kind of drug is fascinating.  This isn't the story about how the fame got to his head and he took drugs as part of the lifestyle.  He was a drug addict and happened to be pretty good at beating the living daylights out of people.  Then, he falls off the horse and is really casual about his recovery.  I had to look it up because the movie doesn't really give us a definitive answer on whether or not Mark was honest about his recovery.  Apparently, after the events of the movie, the real Mark got addicted again and was homeless for a while.  But it is an interesting way to look at the notion of addiction.  Maybe it's a little unfair to paint the story of a comeback from addiction when he was still kind of cheating, but that doesn't make for an interesting movie.

I also loved that this wasn't just the story of Mark Kerr.  Using Mark Coleman as a foil to Kerr is such a tropey mislead and I love it.  Coleman is dorky dad.  I don't know what the real Mark Coleman was like.  Heck, I'm even going to go as far as to say that I'm a different dad than Mark Coleman is.  But we have this guy who seems to have some of his priorities in check contrasted against Mark Kerr, who seems to be a well-managed trainwreck.  It's fun.  But the funny thing is, the movie sets up this notion that the two will have to fight.  As much as Kerr claims to love the people he's playing against, he does take their slights quite personally.  The real weird part is that the fight never happens.  Literally, it seems like it is the climax of the film and that fight never happens.  I'm glad that the movie didn't engineer that fight for the sake of an audience.  That would have been a dealbreaker for me.  But the insane thing is that the Safdies kept on playing up the idea that Kerr would fight Coleman and that Kerr might actually really hurt this nice man who takes care of him.   And, as much as the film sells the fact that Mark is not right in the head due to Dawn's suicide, I also feel like he throws the fight.  I know.  This is headcanon.  But he is on the ground after absolutely wrecking this guy and it seems like that is the mentally healthier option.  I don't know.  I like it.

Maybe I'm just a big hypocrite.  But this is one of those movies that absolutely hit with me.  Maybe it's because I knew nothing about Mark Kerr as opposed to a documentary about Freddie Mercury.  It's not amazing, but the performances alone are worth watching.
Comments

    Film is great.  It can challenge us.   It can entertain us.  It can puzzle us.  It can awaken us.  

    It can often do all these things at the same time.  

    I encourage all you students of film to challenge themselves with this film blog.  Watch stuff outside your comfort zone.  Go beyond what looks cool or what is easy to swallow.  Expand your horizons and move beyond your gut reactions.  

    We live in an era where we can watch any movie we want in the comfort of our homes.  Take advantage of that and explore.

    Author

    Mr. H has watched an upsetting amount of movies.  They bring him a level of joy that few things have achieved.

    Archives

    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Literally Anything: Movies
  • Film Index
  • The Criterion Collection
  • Collections
  • Academy Award Nominees
  • Notes and Links
  • About