• Literally Anything: Movies
  • Film Index
  • The Criterion Collection
  • Collections
  • Academy Award Nominees
  • Notes and Links
  • About
  LITERALLY ANYTHING: MOVIES

Updates

Presence (2024)

6/25/2025

Comments

 
Picture
Rated R for sex, language, murder, and attempted rape.  The odd thing is that this movie could have been an easy PG-13 because each of those elements are so short in the movie and often just tacked on to make the movie seem a little more edgy.  If it wasn't so boring, there would probably be a way to make the movie viewable for younger audiences.  Still...R.

DIRECTOR:  Steven Soderbergh

I almost got away with not watching this.  There would have been this thought that this was one of those fancy pants, A24 wannabe deep horror movies that I never got around to.  But I've seen it.  I have seen it and I also know that it was one of the most deeply disappointing movies I've seen in a while.  Maybe I'm hating on it because I had modest expectations that were not met.  Maybe I'm hating on it because I now have to write about this movie when I have a billion other things to do.  All I can tell you is this:  Presence is kind of terrible.

Now, I can't say that it's objectively terrible. I actually don't like that term.  Besides the fact that entertainment is entirely subjective, Presence, if it wasn't made by Steven Soderbergh would be a "good first attempt at a movie."  I'll be completely candid.  I didn't know that Soderbergh made this when I went into it.  The only thing that I knew about the movie was that it took place from the ghost's perspective.  I mean, considering that I just wrote about In a Violent Nature, a movie that takes a similar premise of telling the story from the slasher's perspective, I knew that the concept had legs.  But while In a Violent Nature --a movie that I acknowledged was a bit flawed in its own way --does something interesting with the role of the first person camera attached to the supernatural being, Presence seems like it is trying to ride high on its concept and practically nothing else.  And even the first person perspective almost detracts from the movie instead of adding to this.

I'm in a pickle now because I want to talk about how the first person perspective is wasted as is the rest of the film.  I really need to keep my focus because I'm trying to knock this bad boy out as fast as I can because I'm starting to stack up some Zatoichi movies in my wake.  I want to talk first about the premise.  The beginning of the movie has that kind of faux A24 / Neon Films vibe of the camera meandering around the house.  The cool thing is that we get a sense of isolation and loneliness from the ghost and that is interesting.  Honestly, A Ghost Story did the same bit a little bit better, but I can't begrudge the few successes this movie has.  Now, the hopes that I had would be that we saw the frustration of this ghost leading to the haunting of the family so we could understand why ghosts behave the way that they do in film.  Unfortunately, we're a little bit in a Casper situation.  The ghost has no malevolence towards the family.  There are moments where we question why the ghost acts in seemingly violent ways.  But most of the movie involves the ghost protecting Chloe.  There isn't much of a threat to the family almost at any point in the film.  The closest we get is bringing the medium in and getting a little ripped off.  So, from a horror perspective, we don't really get the narrative of what causes ghosts to haunt people.  Instead, the ghost mostly just acts as a camera for the audience...because it literally is a camera.  For the majority of the film, you could just write off the camera as not-a-ghost and that's the only thing that Presence is adding to the party.

But let's pretend that the ghost-as-camera thing works like Soderbergh swears it does.  The actual story is almost non-existent.  Before I knew that this was a Soderbergh film, my theory was the following: this was a student short created for film school that was remade by the same person into a feature length film when the short film got more traction than he thought it would. The best part of the movie is that it is only 84 minutes.  The problem is that, even with that runtime, there isn't really 84 minutes of content.  The only recognizable name in this movie is Lucy Liu, who gives a bit of an over-the-top performance in a painfully sedate film.  Much of the movie relies on archetypes instead of nuanced characters.  Mom is evil and potentially sexually interested in her successful oldest son.  Dad is too perfect, frustrated by Mom's continual crossings of boundaries.  Chloe is the suffering rebellious teenager who can't share her feelings with the people who need her to.  Tyler is the quintessential worst jocky bully.  And then Ryan?  Ryan is such an extreme version of a villain it's hilarious.  There's nothing subtle.  When I confused this script for something that came out of film school it's because it reads like everyone has to be quickly understood.  But do you know who wrote this script?  David Koepp.  The guy who wrote Jurassic Park.  I don't even know how you got to this point.  It seems so lazy.  

And part of that is the attempt to get to its twist ending.  One of my biggest frustrations with The Great Gatsby is that the story does cartwheels to get to its shocking ending.  Don't send my boss this blog because she is adamant that The Great Gatsby is perfect.  What I do think about The Great Gatsby is that it is an incredible book that tried to get this perfect dismount of an ending, but strains the conventions of plausibility to get to that ending.  I don't think Presence is an outstanding story before the reveal at the end, but it goes through a bunch of absolutely silly moments to get to that ending.  SPOILER ALERT: The big reveal is that the ghost is Tyler.  There's a throwaway line that the medium says that ghosts experience past, present, and future all scrambled.  So Tyler is there to protect Chloe from Ryan.  That's a fun idea.  I really like that as a reveal.  After all, it explains why the ghosts looks away when Chloe is having sex.  There are small moments that tease that Tyler is the ghost.  Fun.  But here's the problem, that ending is a mess.  Tyler is a ghost protecting his sister from an untimely death even though he's still alive.  At the midway point, Tyler-as-Ghost creates a minor earthquake to stop Ryan from putting date rape drugs in her orange juice.  (Note: these kids are really into orange juice.  It could be with alcohol or it could be just orange juice.  These kids don't care.  They want the orange juice.) But Ryan tries that again and Tyler-as-Ghost doesn't do anything about it.  He instead has to wake his living self up with flashing lights so Tyler-as-Person sprints up the steps (somehow?) to save Chloe.  I don't know how living Tyler knows to do that or how to do that.  Then he...tackles him out the window?  What?  It's so silly.

Presence is an examples of filmmakers putting all of their chips into a gimmick and hoping it pays out.  It doesn't.  The rest of the movie is kind of lazy.  The story isn't that interesting. This is a short film that should not be expanded into a larger film.  
Comments

    Film is great.  It can challenge us.   It can entertain us.  It can puzzle us.  It can awaken us.  

    It can often do all these things at the same time.  

    I encourage all you students of film to challenge themselves with this film blog.  Watch stuff outside your comfort zone.  Go beyond what looks cool or what is easy to swallow.  Expand your horizons and move beyond your gut reactions.  

    We live in an era where we can watch any movie we want in the comfort of our homes.  Take advantage of that and explore.

    Author

    Mr. H has watched an upsetting amount of movies.  They bring him a level of joy that few things have achieved.

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Literally Anything: Movies
  • Film Index
  • The Criterion Collection
  • Collections
  • Academy Award Nominees
  • Notes and Links
  • About